As
the dollar value of high value antique lures rises at a
head-spinning rate, the necessity of accurate grading becomes more
and more critical. When it was just a bunch of good old boys trading
lures they loved, the fine points of grading didn't matter too much.
Today, we are talking about $1,500 or $5,000 lures instead of $5
lures, so the matter of grading is extremely
important.
|

|
Rare
Shakespeare Rhodes minnow, ca. 1907. Lure , $1,500; box,
$2,000. (Photos courtesy Dr. Michael Echols, www.braceface.com/lures/) |
If you want to get into a
fired up argument, put three lure collectors in a circle, throw a
lure in the middle and ask for a grade. More than likely, you will
get three different opinions.
Fact:
Everyone has problems when grading older (pre-1940) lures or boxes
because it is totally subjective. When you start getting picky about
lure condition, a 10X hand-held glass magnifying lens is handy for
examining the paint surface, hardware, and searching for crazing. I
frequently look at lures under a 30X binocular dissecting microscope
just to get an idea of how the surfaces look at high magnification.
This is getting kind of anal about the topic, but if you are looking
for fakes, it is an excellent way to detect
"workmanship".
Visual values vary
considerably from person to person. As we all know, not everyone has
good taste or appreciation for details. But being old is no excuse
for poor condition. I don't know how many times I've heard some guy
lecture me that: "These lures are over 80 years old you know, so you
have to expect a few chips and scrapes." And I just calmly reply,
"True, sir, but the price will have to adjust accordingly for the
chips and scrapes!"
If you've got chips and
scrapes, then we are not talking excellent condition or excellent
prices. If you intend to collect high-grade, excellent condition
lures, the following will explain what excellent and mint
mean:
Mint or New In
The Box: perfect and untouched, new, unfished, no
crazing, and unused. Mint is new from the factory. New! No flaws
whatever, even the varnish is completely clear. Mint is the way they
looked the day they were put in the box at the factory.
Excellent: an almost new lure. It has
some minor, and I do mean minor, defects like tiny pointers (see
definitions below) or a tiny varnish flake. It has most likely never
seen water. Excellent means there is nothing missing from the paint
or varnish. The paint will be shiny and not dull. Dull dirty paint
or baits exposed to gasoline will not have a glossy finish. With
Excellent, there are no obvious paint chips, no big varnish flakes,
but there may be a ring around the belly weight. Expect very minor
unopened age cracks or some "crazing" of the varnish.
Excellent has
two parts: An Excellent
Plus lure means there are no hook pointers in the
paint, absolutely no hook scrapes, no paint off the belly weight, no
paint chips and no varnish flakes. The paint is shiny, but there may
be some age-related crazing or very minor fracture cracks in the
varnish or paint.
Excellent
Minus allows for some minor varnish defects, but no
paint loss other than maybe very, very minor chips at the tail or
belly weight, and no hook drags. Hooks and hardware should be
consistent with the paint finish. Very
Good: Little age cracks; some minor
defects. Good: Some age cracks; starting
to chip; small defects. Average: Some
paint loss and/or chipping; showing
age. Fair: Major paint loss and/or
defects; much chipping. Poor: Parts
missing; poor color and/or major
chipping. Repaint: Original paint covered
in part or all.
Visual Values:
Definitions & Terms The following are commonly used
terms of defects that alter the grade of a lure. They are the types
of defects that can change a grade by a plus or minus, and
understandably the price. No one defect will set the grade, but
these are the types of problems which can be used to differentiate
between Excellent and Excellent minus or between Excellent minus and
Very Good.
Plus and minus are in the
eye of the beholder, but they are the variations which can cause
large swings in price. Most collectors will pay a lot more for an
excellent plus lure than for an excellent minus.
*Pointers:
Marks made by the hook points as they swung around and contacted the
paint or varnish at a single point. Basically, a tiny puncture hole
in the paint or varnish. One or two are no big deal, but when the
surface looks like the face of the moon it's a whole different
matter. When describing pointers, it is best to refer to the exact
number, depth and size. If the hook penetrated into the wood and
created a crater, then that is a worse situation than one which just
marks the varnish and doesn't touch the paint.
*Flakes:
Usually the result of varnish sticking to something and being pulled
off the paint, or an actual varnish chip, but not including the
paint color. Varnish flakes are highly subjective, but in a heavily
varnished lure like a Heddon, large areas of varnish flakes can and
do seriously detract. If you are talking about paint flakes, then
the matter is serious since value decreases drastically with any
paint loss. Heddon series 00 lures are notorious for flaked varnish
due to all the sharp edges. Flaking can usually be expressed in
terms such as minor, heavy, light, or minimal, along with the
location. Examination of the surface with a 10X lens should show
sharp edges of the flakes as opposed to a smooth rounded edge that
may be caused by buffing or chemical treatment of the
surface.
|

|
Super
Rare F.A. Pardee, Musky minnow, ca. 1904. In excellent
condition, $5,000-$7,000; in original box, $8,000-$10,000.
|
*Crazing:
Also known as "checking," these are age-induced, minor separation
fractures of the paint or varnish. Usually, there is a fine quilted
pattern to the cracks that look like brickwork under a
10X-magnifying lens. This is not to be confused with deep splits of
the paint which are better termed as cracks. In a heavily varnished
lure like those produced by Heddon, Pflueger, or South Bend, I
personally find it comforting to see crazing because it is
indicative of age and quality. It is also extremely difficult to
fake subsurface crazing. Terms used to describe crazing would be
lightly crazed, heavily crazed, finely crazed, checking, or only
obvious with a 10X lens.
*Hook
drag: a semi-circular scratch made by a hook into the paint
or varnish. If it is into the paint, then it's serious and greatly
detracts from the value. If only into the varnish and very, very
light, then it's a personal call, but a hook drag takes any lure out
of the excellent range. If you see a semi-circular mark on the
surface, then you are talking hook drag, and it needs to be
described.
*Cracks:
Separation of the paint or varnish down to the wood and not normal.
Cracks are a source of water getting to the wood resulting in
swelling. This causes paint to flake or pop off in large sections.
In some cases, cracks in the paint are like crazing where it is a
feature of rare, early lures. Esthetically disturbing, but it can
verify the origins of the paint on an otherwise excellent condition
lure. Repaints typically would not have cracks. Cracked eyes are
something that should be noted, but have influence on condition only
in the plus and minus department.
*Chip:
Paint loss in varying sizes, but usually down to the wood. If you
think you have to express the amount of paint loss as a percentage,
then forget anything above Very Good for condition. If there is
enough paint loss to worry about expressing it as a percentage, then
you have something in the "fished" or used department. Paint chips
greatly affect the grade of any lure, be it ancient or just old. One
may accept a paint chip, but be sure to carefully note its existence
when describing a lure with paint.
*Shiny
(a.k.a. lipstick shiny, slick, wet): The slick, smooth, non-dull,
quality of well preserved paint which has not been subjected to
chemicals or intense light. The opposite of the shiny surface would
be dull, dirty, and lifeless paint as a result of exposure to
chemicals, light, dirt, or use. Degree in either direction
determines plus or minus grade.
*Beater: A
lure that is in less than average condition. Not collectible, but
useful for parts. Many people who do repaints buy beaters to strip
and repaint. Some of which are passed off as new lures.
|

|
Rare
c.1904 Heddon Slope nose found in Montana in a metal box in
the rafters of a miner's shack. Lure and box in excellent
condition, $5,000-$7,000; lure alone,
$1,500-$2,000. |
*Rub or
scrape: A rub is a smooth, shallow paint or varnish loss
via rubbing, not a chip, not a flake, but more than likely due to
rubbing against a hard object like a box top or being deeply
cleaned. Depending on the extent, a negative factor, but not a big
deal if a light, small area. Scrapes are typically deeper, represent
greater damage, and often involve cutting the paint.
*Otherwise
Excellent: A term used to describe a lure with one small
defect that may or may not affect the asking price of a lure.
Typically, a single minor pointer, flake, chip, or paint off the
belly weight, but not indicative of the whole lure which is
"otherwise excellent".
*Touch-up:
Typically adding new varnish, gill marks, or an attempt to match the
existing antique paint with new paint to hide a defect. A no-no and
automatically removes the lure from being a collectible. Touch-ups
are easily detectable with a black light that will show the
difference in paint age and type. Contrary to the official NFLCC
stand on this issue, I personally don't want a touched up lure in my
collection at today's prices.
*About Very
Good: A term used by some people to avoid listing all the
problems on a lure or box.
*Repaint:
a lure body that has been repainted by an arts and crafts person.
Not something that should be in the tackle collecting scene. If
properly marked, a curiosity fit for shadow box displays used by
sports bars.
*Hangs
well: The ultimate euphemism for "It's only good on one
side". Otherwise see beater.
*Whizzed:
A term used by coin dealers to describe extensive polishing of a
surface. Some people delight in rubbing a lure with cleaner until it
is without gill marks or varnish in an attempt to upgrade the value.
What they accomplish is destruction of the lure and its value.
Cleaning is one thing, polishing to remove the varnish is another.
If you remove the varnish on a lure, you have greatly decreased the
value, and there is no way it can be considered being anything more
than average in grade.
*Worm
burn: The result of a plastic worm being left against lure
paint for an extended time. Typically, the paint melts and leaves a
messy goo where the worm was in contact. Causes a burn-like mark
similar to what a cigarette does to Formica or a laminated furniture
surface. Typically earns the lure a hangs well grade, but eliminates
it from anything above used or beater condition.
*Stupid:
What some of us get when we start rationalizing how valuable a ratty
old lure is because of its age.
----------------------------------------------
Michael Echols is a lure
collector and an orthodontist living in Ft. Myers, Florida. His
website - with many more antique lures - is www.braceface.com/lures.
2002
|